Floom v. Beard
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Be Kalb Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
Covenant. The plaintiff, Francis Floom, declares upon a deed in fee-simple, executed to him by the defendant, George Beard, for the consideration of fifty dollars, for a lot in the town of Canton, Ohio. The’ declaration avers that the deed contains the following among other cove*77nants, viz., that the said Beard was, on the day of the date of the deed, lawfully seised in fee of the premises, and good right to sell and convey the same. The breaches are assigned in the following words: “ And the said Floorn avers that the said Beard was not, on the day and year aforesaid, nor at any time since,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Flood v. YandesIndiana Supreme Court · 1820
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lowry v. HurdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862
- Griner v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1878