Schnitzius v. Bailey
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
Bird, V. C.
Upon final hearing in this case, nothing has been developed in the testimony or in the argument of counsel to vary the important facts upon which my conclusions were founded at the hearing of the order to show cause why a preliminary mandatory injunction should not be issued. See Schnitzius v. Bailey, 13 Stew. Eq. 247. Such an injunction was then advised. The cause was taken to the court of errors and appeals and the order advising ■the injunction was reversed. Bailey v. Schnitzius, 18 Stew. Eq. 178. The only question then was, whether a mandatory injunc-tion should issue at that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Peck v. . GoodberlettNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- McCormick v. . HoranNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hughes v. KnightNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Kearns v. BloomfieldNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927