Legal Opinion

Dugan Bros. of New Jersey, Inc. v. Dunnery

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorschauser, J.

Plaintiff sues to enjoin defendants from enforcing an ordinance which requires the payment of a license fee by peddlers and transient merchants. Plaintiff admits it is engaged in peddling within the village of Suffern. Plaintiff, in its complaint, asserts the ordinance is unconstitutional because it is discriminatory as against non-residents of the village, and further, that the license fee is excessive and is in effect a tax upon plaintiff’s business. On the trial plaintiff conceded that the ordinance was not discriminatory and counsel for plaintiff so states in his brief. It remains for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. People v. JarvisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barnes v. GorhamNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Dugan Bros. of New Jersey, Inc. v. DunneryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  3. City of Long Beach v. Sealtest Foods Divison of National Dairy Products Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API