Legal Opinion
Laclede Steel Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided November 13, 2000No. Consol. 93-09-00569-CVDPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARMAN, Chief Judge.
This Court upholds the conclusions of Commerce in Final Results of Redetermi-nation on Remand Pursuant to Laclede Steel Co., et al. v. United States (Ct. Int’l Trade, Apr. 5, 2000) (Remand Redetermi-nation). This Court grants Plaintiffs’ (Domestic Producers). request that the Remand Redetermination be affirmed in its entirety and denies Defendant-Interve-nors’ (Korean Respondents) request for a remand to Commerce to recalculate company-specific and countrywide ad valorem rates with respect to all domestic loans received by the Korean steel industry after 1984. Also…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Louis C. Ostrer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc., Exxon Corporation and Exxon Research & Engineering Company v. The Lubrizol CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- British Steel PLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
- British Steel Plc v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Frazier & Oxley, L.C. v. CummingsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Saha Thai Steel Pipe (Public) Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Frazier & Oxley, L.C. v. CummingsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004