Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sorensen v. Farmers State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1934No. 28891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEbeely, J.

The Farmers State Bank of Wood River, Nebraska, is an insolvent institution and in charge of a receiver duly appointed.

The appellant, Lyhane, herein designated as plaintiff, by petition of intervention filed in the receivership-, presented his claim for a trust fund against the insolvent bank. His right thereto was challenged by the bank’s receiyer, hereinafter called the defendant, and issues were made up. Upon a hearing on the merits, plaintiff’s claim for a trust fund was disallowed, and from the order of the trial court overruling his motion for a new trial he appeals.

*140This litigation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lyman v. President of the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  2. Merchants' Bank v. RudolfNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Omaha & Republican Valley Railroad v. MoschelNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Dunn v. BozarthNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Salladin v. MitchellNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ashby v. PetersNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Craig v. KileNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Lyhane v. DurtschiNebraska Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API