Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Langkamp

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 2009No. 2008AP2283-DPublished

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review the amended stipulation filed by Attorney Jay M. Langkamp and the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) pursuant to SCR 22.12,1 wherein Attorney Langkamp admits to the facts and misconduct alleged by the OLR as set forth in the parties' stipulation. Attorney Langkamp admits to 15 counts of misconduct involving four clients. The misconduct includes failing to communicate with a client; unilaterally terminating his representation of clients and failing to protect the clients' interests by giving them reasonable notice to employ another attorney; failing to refund the portion of fees…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against NorlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against ArteryWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against SchrinskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API