Legal Opinion
Olson v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided January 25, 2006No. 3:04-mj-00102PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 3 TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF IRRELEVANT PRODUCT RECALLS
HOVLAND, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is the “Defendant’s Motion in Limine No. 3 to Exclude Evidence of Irrelevant Product Recalls,” filed on January 6, 2006. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants the motion.
I. BACKGROUND
The defendant, Ford Motor Company (Ford), requests an order (1) excluding from evidence all recalls for any Ford vehicle, including, but not limited to the 1998 Ford Explorer; (2) precluding plaintiff and her counsel and witnesses from referring directly or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Evelyn and Jack Lewy v. Remington Arms Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- 31 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 755, prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 12,632 Claudia Hessen, Arnold Hessen, for Use and Benefit of Allstate Insurance Co. v. Jaguar Cars, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- James Richard Kane v. The Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Jordan v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1985
- Fortune Funding, Llc, a Florida Limited Liability Company v. Ceridian Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Malcolm v. EVENFLO CO., INC.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
- Malcolm v. EVENFLO CO., INC.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
- WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. v. 189.9 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 W Section 11: W1/2SE1/4 Section 14: NW1/4NE1/4 McKenzie County, North DakotaDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2021