Legal Opinion

The Maria White

District Court, D. Maine

Decided May 15, 1869PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In admiralty. Libel in personam by the owners of the vessel against the shippers, to recover freight according to the terms of a bill of lading, for carrying a cargo of ice from Gardiner, Maine, to New Orleans, that had been sold on arrival by the master from necessity, inasmuch as it was perishable and the consignees had refused to receive it.

Read the full summary

In admiralty. Libel in personam by the owners of the vessel against the shippers, to recover freight according to the terms of a bill of lading, for carrying a cargo of ice from Gardiner, Maine, to New Orleans, that had been sold on arrival by the master from necessity, inasmuch as it was perishable and the consignees had refused to receive it. The owners of the cargo, who were both shippers and consignees, appeared, and answered that they did not refuse to receive the cargo at the port of discharge, but that the master, without authority or necessity, sold and sacrificed it, and that the…

1Opinion of the Court

FOX, District Judge.

This libel is promoted by the owners oí the brig, one of whom was master, to recover from the respondents Messrs. Cheeseman and Marshall, the balance of the freight for the transportation of a cargo of ice for the respondents from Gardiner to New Orleans. The bill of lading is produced as evidence of the contract. It bears date at Gardiner, August 21, 1865, and recites “the lading on board of the brig of 260 tons of ice by the respondents; ice and dunnage to be loaded and discharged by shippers, with the assistance of vessel’s crew; freight $3,000.” Certain stipulations…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Heckscher v. McCreaNew York Supreme Court · 1840

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. J. J. Moore & Co. v. CornwallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API