Legal Opinion

Dighton v. Federal Pacific Electric Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 21, 1987PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, J.

The defendant and third-party plaintiff, Federal Pacific Electric Company (Federal Pacific), asks us to reconsider whether a manufacturer is protected by the so-called “statute of repose,” G. L. c. 260, § 2B4 (hereafter § 2B); *689and, if not, whether the statute is unconstitutional because it is violative of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States or art. 11 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth.

These questions come to us on a scanty record, comprised largely of the pleadings. Nonetheless, the following facts are not disputed. On November 18,1980, fire ravaged an…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Klein v. CatalanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Back v. Wickes Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Hanlon v. RollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Hoffman v. Howmedica, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. Crandall Dry Dock Engineers, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Trust Company Bank v. United States Gypsum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. Dighton v. FED. PAC. ELEC. CO. SERT, JACKSON & ASSOC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  3. Brown v. Overhead Door Corp.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1994
  4. Snow v. Harnischfeger Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
  5. Pereira v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API