Legal Opinion

DiChellis v. Peterson Chiropractic Clinic

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 1981No. 80CA0936PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN CISE, Judge.

Plaintiff, James B. DiChellis, appeals a summary judgment in favor of defendants, Peterson Chiropractic Clinic (the clinic) and Dr. Joseph Dick Peterson, entered on the ground that plaintiff did not commence his malpractice action within the period specified by the appropriate statute of limitations. We reverse.

From the admissions in the pleadings, the exhibits, affidavits, and depositions, it appears that on April 18, 1975, plaintiff went to the clinic to have his ankle treated. An individual at the clinic treated the ankle. Then, although plaintiff allegedly did not complain…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Owens v. BrochnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  2. Jacobson v. DoanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  3. Bernstein v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  4. McCormick v. DIAMOND SHAMROCK CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  5. Hutchinson v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Riley v. PresnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Southerland v. Argonaut Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. McIntosh v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF SCHOOL DIST.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Hansen v. LongColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. MacUrdy v. FaureColorado Court of Appeals · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API