King v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Bristol, rendered January 9, 1901, in an action of ejectment, wherein the plaintiff in error was the plaintiff, and the defendant in error was the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtHarbison, J.
This action of ejectment was brought to recover the possession of certain real estate in the city of Bristol. The declaration is in the usual form and unexceptionable on demurrer. In response to the demand of the defendant, and in pursuance of the court’s order requiring the same, the plaintiff filed a statement or bill of particular^ setting forth fully the grounds of his claim. The demurrer was directed to the declaration and the bill of particulars as being insufficient in law. This court has held that the bill of particulars required by section 3248 of the Code is no part of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- George Campbell Co. v. George Angus & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- King v. Norfolk & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1893
3Cited by20 opinions
- Brown v. HaleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
- Elder v. HollandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
- City of Norfolk v. Norfolk CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
- Irvin v. StoverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
- Smith v. WolsieferSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.