Legal Opinion

Porter v. Hughes

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1893No. Civil No. 306PublishedCited by 12 opinions

MANDAMUS.- Original application. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

The plaintiff, "W. W. Porter, applies to this court for a peremptory writ of mandamus to be directed to the defendant Thomas Hughes, auditor of the territory, requiring him, as said auditor, to issue a warrant on the treasurer of the territory, in favor of the plaintiff, for the sum of twelve hundred dollars. This sum plaintiff claims to be due him for salary as one of the district judges of the territory for the years 1887. and 1888, under an act of the legislative assembly entitled “An act making appropriations for the current and contingent expenses of the civil government of the territory…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fulmore v. LaneTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State ex rel. Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. HenryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Lukens v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Mills v. PorterMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State Ex Rel. Link v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API