Legal Opinion
Pignataro v. Rutledge
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 4, 2003No. 2D01-5521PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
841 So.2d 636 (2003)
Philip PIGNATARO, Appellant,
v.
Ara RUTLEDGE, Appellee.
No. 2D01-5521.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
April 4, 2003.
Philip Pignataro, pro se.
No appearance for Appellee Ara Rutledge.
STRINGER, Judge.
Philip Pignataro, the former husband, challenges various aspects of the final judgment dissolving his marriage to Ara Rutledge, the former wife. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
Pignataro and Rutledge were married in 1995, and they have two children, one born in 1995 and the other born in 1998. In July 1999, Rutledge filed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Applegate v. Barnett Bank of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Robertson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Lavelle v. LavelleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Prest v. TracyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Bader v. BaderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brown v. ReynoldsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Burnham v. BurnhamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Gulledge v. GulledgeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Lule v. LuleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Lanier v. LanierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.