Legal Opinion
Crandall v. City and County of Denver
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 10, 2006No. 04CA1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDailey, J.
Defendant, the City and County of Denver, brings this interlocutory appeal pursuant to § 24-10-108, C.R.S.2005, from the trial court’s order denying its motion seeldng dismissal, on governmental immunity grounds, of the complaint brought by plaintiffs, Terri Crandall and Joann Hubbard, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated. We affirm.
Plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages for injuries they allegedly received as a result of exposure to harmful environmental conditions at Denver International Airport (DIA), which is owned and operated by the City. Plaintiffs were…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Trinity Broadcasting of Denver, Inc. v. City of WestminsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Woodsmall v. Regional Transportation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Tidwell v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Finnie v. Jefferson County School District R-1Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crandall v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- City and County of Denver v. CrandallSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Brown Group Retail, Inc. v. State & Colorado Department of TransportationColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. StanleyColorado Court of Appeals · 2007