Ross v. Smith

Roberts, Chief Justice.

The object of this appeal is to show that the court below erred in refusing to turn over to Wesley Ross, guardian of the minors, the two mules that had been decreed by the District Court to be sold to satisfy a judgment rendered in favor of Sarah 0. Smith, together *399with the rest of the property of the estate of John W. Eoss, in lieu of a homestead and other exempt property. It is not shown what the two mules were worth, further than may be inferred from the price agreed to be paid for them by the deceased, John W. Eoss, to Sarah C. Smith, which was two hundred dollars,…