MATTER OF ELM REALTY, INC. v. Office of Rent Control
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified by reinstating the rent commissioner’s determination relating to Elm Realty, Inc., and the petitioner Visco insofar as the commissioner directed Visco to repay illegally collected rent.
With respect to Elm Realty, Inc., the commissioner did not misconstrue the statute (Administrative Code of City of New York, § Y51-11.0, subd b, par [2], cl [a]) or abuse his discretion as a matter of law by imposing a penalty for each monthly overcharge of rent.
With respect to petitioner Visco the Appellate Division erred in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. MintzNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Carr v. . RischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. EkiniciNew York Supreme Court · 2002
- 78/79 York Associates v. RandCivil Court of the City of New York · 1998
- Martindale v. NovelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Town of Nassau v. NalleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- Town of Nassau v. NalleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.