Lemcke v. State

MORROW, Judge.

Appellant was charged by information afid conivicted for slander by imputing the want of chastity ,to a female in the presence of J. J. Fortenberry and others, and fined $100.

Fortenberry testified that appellant used in substance the language charged in the information in his presence and in the presence of Jeromp Kruger. From his testimony it appears that appellant came to his house in company with Kruger and that Kruger heard such conversation as took place. It seems from his testimony that the conversation was prii marily with reference to a fence, but incidentally the…