People v. Edwards
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge TAUBMAN.
Challenging the constitutionality of the habitual criminal statute, §16-13-103, C.R.S. 1998, on the ground that it denies a defendant the right to a jury trial on habitual criminal charges, defendant, William Edwards, appeals the trial court adjudication determining him to be a habitual criminal. We do not agree that the statute is unconstitutional and, therefore, affirm.
Defendant was convicted by a jury of first degree assault. In a hearing to the court, pursuant to §16-13-103, the court determined that defendant had six prior felony convictions. It then sentenced him…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Spaziano v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McDonald v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Department of Health v. DonahueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Massey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
- Armintrout v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Edwards v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- People v. VigilColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. NunnColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. Rivera-BottzeckColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.