Legal Opinion

People v. Edwards

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 24, 1998No. 97CA0232PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge TAUBMAN.

Challenging the constitutionality of the habitual criminal statute, §16-13-103, C.R.S. 1998, on the ground that it denies a defendant the right to a jury trial on habitual criminal charges, defendant, William Edwards, appeals the trial court adjudication determining him to be a habitual criminal. We do not agree that the statute is unconstitutional and, therefore, affirm.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of first degree assault. In a hearing to the court, pursuant to §16-13-103, the court determined that defendant had six prior felony convictions. It then sentenced him…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Spaziano v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. McDonald v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Department of Health v. DonahueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  4. Massey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
  5. Armintrout v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Edwards v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  2. People v. VigilColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. People v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. People v. NunnColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. People v. Rivera-BottzeckColorado Court of Appeals · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API