Burnett v. . Snyder
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of Hew York, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee. (Reported below, 13 J. & S. 571.) This action was brought upon an account against the firm of Strang, Platt & Co., of which firm defendants were alleged to be members. Defendant Snyder alone appeared and answered, denying that he was a partner. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of Hew York, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee. (Reported below, 13 J. & S. 571.) This action was brought upon an account against the firm of Strang, Platt & Co., of which firm defendants were alleged to be members. Defendant Snyder alone appeared and answered, denying that he was a partner. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The defendant Snyder was not a partner in the firm in question. (Burnett v. Snyder, 76 N. Y. 344.) It is not essential that an…
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
The case of Burnett v. Snyder et al. (76 N. Y. 344) was an action brought to recover a debt owing by the firm of Strang, Platt & Co., to the plaintiff, and Snyder was made a defendant upon the allegation that he was a co-partner with the other defendants in that firm. In that case the plaintiff, to sustain the averment that Snyder was a partner, relied upon a written agreement, made December 31, 1869, between Snyder and Peter 0. Strang and Ammon Platt, two of the members of the firm of Strang, Platt & Co., executed concurrently with the creation of the partnership, which recited that it was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leggett v. . HydeNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Richardson v. . HughittNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Rogers v. Hosack's ExecutorsNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Vanderburgh v. Hull & BowneNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Burnett v. . SnyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
3Cited by24 opinions
- Meehan v. ValentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Fechteler v. Palm Bros. & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
- Sanger v. . FrenchNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Rosenblum v. Springfield Produce Brokerage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Mitchel v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.