Legal Opinion

Calhoun v. Calhoun

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 21, 1939PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Where the parents of a child are unable to adequately provide for it, a grandparent of sufficient means may be held liable for the support of the grandchild. (Domestic Relations Court Act of City of New York, § 101, subd. 3; § 92, subd. 3. See, also, Public Welfare Law, § 125; Code Crim. Proc. § 914; Rowley v. Fuller, 251 App. Div. 793; affd., 276 N. Y. 519.) However, the evidence here failed to show that appellant, the grandmother of the infant, was of sufficient means to support it and that the parents, who are primarily hable, were unable to provide the necessary support.

*673For the foregoing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rowley v. FullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Rowley v. FullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of McClancyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
  2. In re the Estate of KasnerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  3. Caplan v. CaplanNew York Family Court · 1942
  4. In re the Accounting of TarantinoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1944
  5. McManus v. LollarNew York Supreme Court · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API