Legal Opinion
Mary Hoeft v. Tucson Unified School District
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 17, 1992No. 90-16358Published
1Opinion of the Court
967 F.2d 1298
76 Ed. Law Rep. 47
Mary HOEFT, individually and as a parent of Donovan Hoeft;
et al., on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
TUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a political subdivision of
the State of Arizona; C. Diane Bishop, in her capacity as
Superintendent of Public Instruction for the State of
Arizona, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-16358.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Nov. 6, 1991.
Decided June 17, 1992.
Thomas J. Berning, Tucson, Ariz., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Ruth B. Davis, Tucson, AZ, for Tucson United…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.