Lane v. Happ Bros.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. The mere fact that a crop, consisting of corn, which was found in the possession of the husband as the defendant in execution, was raised upon his wife’s land, in the absence of any evidence authorizing an inference that the wife farmed on the land or raised the crop, is, on the trial of a claim filed by the wife, insufficient to rebut the presumption of the husband’s ownership of the property, arising from the fact of his possession of the property at the time of the levy.
2. Where a witness testifies to a fact which is manifestly a conclusion of the witness and is based upon other facts…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Bailey v. NewberryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Southwest Georgia Production Credit Ass'n v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Stephens v. Southern Discount Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Jackson v. Kennesaw Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Biggers v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.