Legal Opinion

Clark v. Gregg, Whitehead & Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 9, 1922No. 9950PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action on promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Clarence J. Morley, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Teller

The defendants in error, a copartnership, brought an action against the plaintiff in error, and three others, upon a promissory note executed by the plaintiff in error, and had judgment. The cause is before us on error.

The complaint charged that the four defendants purchased from the plaintiff 2,000 shares of the capital stock of The Lusk Royalty Company, and as part payment therefor, caused defendant Clark “as trustee for all of said defendants to, and said Paul M. Clark did, make, execute and deliver to plaintiff a promissory note” etc. The note is attached as an exhibit and made a part of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sago v. AshfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API