Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Early

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 30, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Sac District Court. — Hon. J. H. Macomber, Judge. Appeal by D. Carr Early from a judgment rendered against him, and in favor of A. B. Bruner and C. M. Wickersham. The material facts involved in the case are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

In March, 1881, the defendant David Herrold made to plaintiff Daniel Pierce his promissory note for two thousand dollars, and to secure its payment executed a mortgage on four hundred acres of land in Sac county. His interest in three hundred and twenty acres of the land was derived by warranty deed from defendant Early. Herrold executed to defendant James P. Wickersham a warranty deed for the mortgaged premises. In March, 1883, Wickersham executed to defendant A. B. Bruner a warranty deed for one hundred and sixty acres of the land which had been deeded by Early. The title of Early was…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilhelmi v. Des Moines InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  2. Wilson v. RiddickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API