Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 2018No. 2017–0487PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1221{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Samuel Ray Smith II, Attorney Registration No. 0076242, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of December 6, 2017, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of 18 months, with the final 12 months stayed on the condition that he engage in no further misconduct, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith.Ohio Supreme Court · 2017

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API