Mrs. Walter Lane Smith v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of respective counsel;
And the Court being of the opinion that the findings of fact by the District Judge are supported by the evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and that there is no error in his conclusions of law based thereon, 85 F.Supp. 838; Lazier v. United States, 8 Cir., 170 F.2d 521; Sic v. Commissioner, 8 Cir., 177 F.2d 469; Pettit v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 175 F.2d 195; Baruch v. Commissioner, 11 T.C. 96, affirmed, 2 Cir., 178 F.2d 402.
It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lazier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Sic v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
- Baruch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1948
- Pettit v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1948
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. KoshlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Burns v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
- Weill v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
- Puente v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- CLuck v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.