City of San Antonio v. Willinger
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
City of San Antonio has appealed from a condemnation’award of $88,500' for property used as a dog kennel. City urges that (1) the jury improperly considered the value of the kennel business, which was not a proper element of damages, (2) while discussing the condemnee’s income tax return, which showed a taxable income a little in excess of $5,000, some juror stated that the income must have been double that amount, and (3) one juror was disqualified because he stated during deliberations that the City would have given som.e big company $100,000 and should do as much for the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Akers v. EppersonTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Blaugrund v. GishTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. NoelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Burnett v. RutledgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Frontier Theatre, Inc. v. WhisenantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company v. GregoryTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Bettis v. BettisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Bailey v. RainsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Hauck v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company v. GregoryTexas Supreme Court · 1965