Legal Opinion

Richard v. James

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 30, 1956No. 17775PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

This is an action wherein plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, sought to have declared void and of no effect a deed and trust agreement whereby defendants, as trustees, became grantees of certain properties therein described. In her behalf it is charged that said deed and trust agreement did not constitute an irrevocable transfer of said properties in trust, but that said transaction was colorable merely and resorted to for the purpose of defeating the rights of plaintiff by perpetrating a fraud upon her.

No oral evidence was offered in the trial court, the case having been submitted on an agreed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moedy v. MoedySupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  2. Thuet v. ThuetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  3. Bostron v. BostronSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Questions Submitted by United States Dist. Ct.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  2. Hayutin v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  3. Denver National Bank v. Von BrechtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  4. Hageman v. First National Bank of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Estate of BarnhartColorado Court of Appeals · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API