Legal Opinion

Joe Aragon Martinez v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 30, 1970No. 243-69PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Martinez appeals from denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. In 1966, he was convicted under a two-count indictment charging violations of 26 U.S.C. §§ 4742(a) and 4744(a). The conviction was affirmed in Martinez v. United States, 373 F.2d 810 (10th Cir. 1967).

Martinez alleged in his motion that he was mentally incompetent at the time of his trial in May, 1966. The district court properly ordered an evidentiary hearing, see Butler v. United States, 361 F.2d 869 (10th Cir. 1966), to determine whether, at the time of his trial, movant had “sufficient -present ability to consult with his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Minor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Joe Aragon Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. William Leroy Crail v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  2. John Lee Arnold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  3. Richard L. Lucero v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  4. Burlee Carroll v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. Richard Allen Tanner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API