Abrams v. Madison County Highway Department
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McCANLESS, Justice.
This case presents an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Madison County, that the appellant, Ovid Abrams, is not entitled to benefits under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Tennessee because: (1) the appellant was found not to be an employee of the Madison County Highway Department at the time of his accident and resulting injury; and (2) that his labor at the Madison County Highway Department was not voluntary.
The material facts disclose that Abrams was convicted of assault and battery in the General Sessions Court of Hardin County. He…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Haworth v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
- Republic-Franklin Insurance v. City of AmherstOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Tackett v. Lagrange PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1975
- Claim of Reid v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Howard v. UseltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.