Legal Opinion
City of Albany v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided September 7, 1972No. Claim No. 46579PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMilton Albert, J.
This is a claim for the appropriation of lands owned by the claimant, City of Albany, taken pursuant to *295article XII-B of the Highway Law. The proceeding is described as Riverfront Arterial — City of Albany, Map No. 3, Parcel No. 3; Map No. 4, Parcel No. 4; Map No. 5, Parcel No. 5; Map No. 6, Parcels No’d. 6 and 7; Map No. 10, Parcel No. 22; Map No. 11, Parcels No’d. 12 and 19; Map No. 13, Parcel No. 15; Map No. 15, Parcel No. 21; and Map No. 18, Parcel No. 25. Map No. 3, Parcel No. 3, and Map No. 6, Parcels No’d. 6 and 7, were for temporary easements.
Maps No’d. 3, 4, 5, 6, 10,13,15 and 18,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Economy Light & Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Hinkley v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Hinkley v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- People ex rel. New York Central Railroad v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
3Cited by3 opinions
- Peasley v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1980
- City of New York v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- City of Albany v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1973