Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bragg

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 31, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

The complaint charges that on November' 30, 1950, the defendant “did take shellfish, to wit: clams, from the shores, flats or waters within the city of Quincy without first obtaining a permit therefor from the board of license commissioners of the city” in violation of a city ordinance. In the Superior Court the case was submitted to a judge on a statement of agreed facts, and the'defendant was sentenced to pay a fine of $5. Being of opinion that there is involved a question of law so important or doubtful as to require the decision of this court, the judge, with the consent of the defendant,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  2. City of Quincy v. Brooks-Skinner, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  3. Teasdale v. Newell & Snowling Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  4. Proctor v. WellsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  5. Commonwealth v. HowesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barlow v. Town of WarehamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  2. Town of Wellfleet v. GlazeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. Town of Wellfleet v. GlazeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API