Commonwealth v. Bragg
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
The complaint charges that on November' 30, 1950, the defendant “did take shellfish, to wit: clams, from the shores, flats or waters within the city of Quincy without first obtaining a permit therefor from the board of license commissioners of the city” in violation of a city ordinance. In the Superior Court the case was submitted to a judge on a statement of agreed facts, and the'defendant was sentenced to pay a fine of $5. Being of opinion that there is involved a question of law so important or doubtful as to require the decision of this court, the judge, with the consent of the defendant,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- City of Quincy v. Brooks-Skinner, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Teasdale v. Newell & Snowling Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Proctor v. WellsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Commonwealth v. HowesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barlow v. Town of WarehamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Town of Wellfleet v. GlazeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Town of Wellfleet v. GlazeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988