Legal Opinion · Dissent

Linder Industrial Machinery Co. v. Berry

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 16, 1980No. 79-1293Published

1DissentCampbell, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I do so because I believe the trial court and the majority mistakenly interpreted and relied on Section 212.06(5)(a), Florida Statutes (1973), to exempt a transaction which, but for that mistaken interpretation and reliance, would clearly be taxable. In every other transaction a sales tax consequence would occur in Florida when title to the article sold passed in Florida. As a general rule title passes when delivery from the control of the buyer to the control of the seller occurs in Florida. The legislature provided an exception to that rule in a special limited…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. A. G. Spalding & Bros. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. State Tax Commission v. Pacific States Cast Iron Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gough Industries, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API