Legal Opinion
Castle Heights, Inc. v. United States
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided May 25, 1965No. Civ. A. Nos. 1813-1816PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT L. TAYLOR, Chief Judge.
Before the Court for consideration is defendant’s motion for a directed verdict which was renewed within ten days after a mistrial was declared due to the inability of the jury to agree. In support of the motion, it is urged that the case involved questions of law solely for the determination of the Court and that the evidence failed to create an issue for the determination of the jury.
The actions were filed by Castle Heights, Inc., (hereafter called Castle), a Tennessee corporation, with principal offices at Newport and M. M. Bullard and wife, Dorothy Bullard,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- John v. Rowan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Sun Properties, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Camp Wolters Enterprises, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Aqualane Shores, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Aqualane Shores, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. CohenDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1965
- Gyro Engineering Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1967