Almeida v. Price
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Plaintiffs brought an action for specific performance of an option to purchase contained in a lease. Judgment went for defendants. Plaintiffs appeal.
Questions Presented
1. Sufficiency of the evidence.
2. Sufficiency of the finding on estoppel.
3. The liability of the remaindermen, rather than the life tenant, for taxes and insurance.
Record
Plaintiff Antonio is the son of defendant Mary Price. Plaintiff Margaret is his wife. Defendants Joseph and Rose are the brother and sister respectively of Antonio and the children of Mary. The complaint alleged the making of a lease by Mary to plaintiffs of a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Leathers v. LeathersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Department of Social Welfare v. MacHadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Hayes v. KhinooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
3Cited by2 opinions
- Keesecker v. BirdWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- Estate of Clark CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2020