Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Inzer

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 1, 1933No. 7 Div. 210Published

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

As stated in brief of appellants’ counsel: “We desire to raise the proposition as to whether or not a mortgage, clearly showing on its. face-that foreclosure .could be had by merely advertising the property and jjublicly selling the same in front of the Court House doors, could be foreclosed in the Equity Court where no certain provision to that effect is contained in the mortgage.”

It has been repeatedly and continuously held by this court that equity has jurisdiction to foreclose a mortgage, notwithstanding there is a power of sale contained therein. Palmer v. Sulzby,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vaughan v. MarableSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Bedell v. New England Mortgage Security Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Eslava v. New York National Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. McGowan v. Branch Bank at MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
  5. Palmer v. SulzbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API