Legal Opinion
In Re the Arbitration Between Fils Et Cables D'Acier De Lens & Midland Metals Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 5, 1984No. 83 Civ. 7073 (WCC)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CONNER, District Judge:
Fils et Cables d’Acier de Lens (“FICAL”) has petitioned this Court pursuant to § 9 of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 9, to confirm an arbitration award rendered on September 23, 1983 against respondent Midland Metals Corporation (“Midland”). Midland has cross-petitioned the Court to vacate, or in the alternative to modify, that same award. For the reasons stated below, both motions are granted in part.
I
The underlying dispute between the parties concerns the quality of certain galvanized wire furnished by FICAL to Midland pursuant to two written…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cable Connection, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,081 Paul Szuts, Magda Szuts v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Creative Securities Corp. v. Bear Stearns & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Uhc Management Company, Inc. v. Computer Sciences Corporation, Computer Sciences Corporation, a Nevada Corporation v. Uhc Management Company, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, Uhc Management Company, Inc. v. Computer Sciences Corporation, Computer Sciences Corporation, a Nevada Corporation v. Uhc Management Company, Inc., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- UHC Management Co. v. Computer Sciences Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.