Rittierodt v. State Farm Insurance Company
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The only question in this appeal arises out of the sufficiency of the evidence presented by Jeremy Rittierodt (Rittierodt) to justify an instruction to the jury on future medical expenses, future pain and suffering, and the loss of enjoyment of life. The trial judge refused an instruction on these elements of damage because of his view that the evidence was not sufficient to justify a finding of such damages by the jury. We have searched the limited record that the parties designated to be transmitted to this Court, and we are in accord with the ruling of the trial judge. The…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Martin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Scadden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ShraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Byerly v. MadsenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jennifer P. Hanft, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Bret Lee Vance v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
- Wyoming Medical Center, Inc. v. MurrayWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Spencer D. Willey v. Bertha I. Willey, Allen F. Willey, Individually, and First Federal Savings Bank of Sheridan, Wyoming as Trustee of the Allen F. Willey Revocable Trust Dated September 12, 2001, as Amended and Restated On November 4, 2010Wyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Addakai v. WittWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Oregonian Publishing Co., LLC v. WallerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.