Legal Opinion

Smith v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 8, 1922No. Appeals, Nos. 372 and 373PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Frazer,

Adeline Smith, a minor, and James Smith, her father, sued to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the child, the result of the sudden starting of freight cars which had been standing on defendant’s tracks at a permissive crossing and between which she was attempting to pass. The case was submitted to the jury, a verdict rendered for each plaintiff and defendant appealed. The sole question for our consideration is whether de*99fendant owed a duty to plaintiff which it failed to perform.

The accident happened on what would be a crossing of Eighty-first…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Counizzarri v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. Francis v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Lodge v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Figueroa Lugo v. American Railroad Co. of Porto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1944
  2. Dimarco v. Penna. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Hojecki v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Koontz v. Baltimore Ohio R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Shaw v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API