Legal Opinion
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 7, 2000No. 99-70945PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
The Petitioners challenge the final rule by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) approving oxygenated fuel standards set by the revised Nevada State Implementation Plan (“SIP”). The EPA ruling approved a SIP amendment revising a Clark County, Nevada regulation requir*1248ing all gasoline sold in the wintertime to have an oxygen content of at least 3.5 percent. The Petitioners claim that the EPA misconstrued section 211(m) of the Clean Air Act, that the county should not have been allowed to require a minimum oxygen content of more than 2.7 percent and that the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- City of Park City v. Alon USA Energy Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Exxon Mobil Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000