Legal Opinion
Chenango & Unadilla Telephone Corp. v. Public Service Commission
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 25, 1974PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
Petitioner, the Chenango and Unadilla Telephone Corporation (hereafter C & Ü), challenges the propriety of *411certain actions taken by the respondent Public Service Commission in the course of a proceeding to fix a new rate for its services. Though complicated, the facts are not in serious dispute.
' In 1968 petitioner was acquired by the Continental Telephone Company, a holding company, but continued as an active operating concern providing telephone service to some 36,000 customers in central up-State New York. In October of 1972 it filed a revised rate schedule with respondent designed to…
2Cited by6 opinions
- New York Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Kessel v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Long Island Water Corp. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Suffolk Sanitary Corp. v. Town BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.