Nix v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
1. That part of the charge excepted to in special ground 1 of the motion for new trial as being erroneous is word for word in the language of an approved charge in Butler v. State, 34 Ga. App. 531 (130 S. E. 370). See also Gillespie v. State, 37 Ga. App. 507 (140 S. E. 791), and cit. This ground is not meritorious.
2. That part of the charge excepted to in special ground 2 as being erroneous is substantially the same as the charge approved in Long v. State, 127 Ga. 350, 354 (56 S. E. 444). See also Jones v. State, 70 Ga. App. 431, 443 (28 S. E. 2d, 373) ; Perrin v. State, 69 Ga. App. 417, 418…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Long v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Kimbrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Perren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946