Legal Opinion

Krist v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 1980No. Appeal, No. 100 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

This is Catherine Krist’s appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board affirming a referee’s determination that Mrs. Krist’s disability related to her back is not compensable under The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §1 et seq.

*129The facts as found by the referee and supported by substantial evidence in the record are as follows:. Mrs. Krist was .employed by National Home Life and Assurance Company as a mail clerk. She suffered for several years prior to the event about to be described from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Allen v. Patterson-Emerson-Comstock, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. McCarthy v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Miller v. SCHIFFNERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Dunbeker v. Duquesne Brew. Co. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Mutual Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Insteel Industries v. WCAB (Litzenberger)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API