Legal Opinion

Bonamico v. Kisella

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 10, 2008No. A07A1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bernes, Judge.

Brad and Lanette Bonamico appeal from the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment to Progressive American Insurance Company, their uninsured motorist (UM) insurance provider, in a lawsuit involving injuries sustained by Brad Bonamico in a motor vehicle accident. The sole issue on appeal is whether Progressive, as a UM provider, is statutorily obligated to pay a punitive damages judgment in the event that one is awarded to the Bonamicos. Based upon the prior precedent of this Court and our Supreme Court, we conclude that the answer to this question is no.

The facts of this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roman v. TerrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  2. Dees v. LoganSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  3. Gordon v. Atlanta Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. WeathersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  5. Moore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carter v. Progressive Mountain InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  2. Smith v. StoddardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Carter v. Progressive Mountain InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API