Commonwealth v. Gonzalez
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKantrowitz, J.
In this case we are faced with the interaction of two common legal principles which ordinarily do not conflict, but theoretically do so in the unique facts here. The first principle is that a jury may believe all, some, or none of the testimony of a witness; the second principle is that the view of the evidence must be rational.
A jury convicted the defendant of trafficking in twenty-eight to ninety-nine grams of heroin (G. L. c. 94C, § 32E[c]); trafficking in twenty-eight to ninety-nine grams of cocaine (G. L. c. 94C, § 32E[h]); possession of marijuana with intent to distribute (G. L. c. 94C,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CampbellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Commonwealth v. VanderpoolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Commonwealth v. SantoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. OwensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Commonwealth v. EgertonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FritzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Commonwealth v. MoraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
- Commonwealth v. TeixeiraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Commonwealth v. TrappagaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010