Legal Opinion

Wayland v. City of Arlington

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1986No. C-4335PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

The City of Arlington sued Marcus Way-land for recovery of $5,000 due under a promissory note. Wayland filed a counterclaim for the reasonable value of materials and labor provided for water and sewer improvements made in the development of Timbercreek Estates, an addition to the City of Arlington. Based upon the jury's answers to special issues, the trial court rendered judgment that the City take nothing and Wayland recover $5,834.80 on his counterclaim. The trial court denied Way-land recovery of reasonable attorney’s fees.

The court of appeals found that there was insufficient evidence to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gates v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Brazos County Water Control & Improvement District No. 1 v. Salvaggio, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
  3. City of Arlington v. WaylandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Barker v. EckmanTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Smith v. Patrick W.Y. Tam TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Allison v. Fire Insurance Exchange, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
  4. Kenneth L. Coffel, Cross-Appellee v. Stryker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  5. Spangler v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API