Legal Opinion

Noell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 3, 2016No. 1D15-5352Published

1Per curiam

We affirm, in part, the denial of the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to strike the appellant’s designation as a sexual offender for count II (unlawful use of a two-way communications device) on the written judgment and sentence, as that offense does not qualify for sexual offender designation under section 943,0435(l)(a)l., Florida Statutes (2012). Because it is a ministerial act, the appellant need not be present. See Bauder v. State, 983 So.2d 1244 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED in part with directions.

ROBERTS, C.J.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bauder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API