Legal Opinion

Mateo v. Warden

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 11, 2025No. 3:25-cv-00814Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT VIDAL MATEO, Petitioner, No. 3:25-cv-00814 (VAB) v. WARDEN, FCI Danbury, Respondent. RULING AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS Vidal Mateo (“Petitioner”), currently incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institute in Danbury, Connecticut (“FCI Danbury”), filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under

28 U.S.C. § 2241

to challenge his arrest and return to prison while he was in prerelease custody under time credits earned under the First Step Act,

18 U.S.C. § 3632

(“First Step…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Ross v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Walker v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API