Legal Opinion
Rose v. Union Gas & Oil Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 10, 1924No. 3953PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). It is claimed on the part of the appellees that T. C. Rose, under the conditions and reservations in his deed to C. C. Rose, had authority to lease this land for oil and gas for 10 years, or any other term; that the signature of C. C. Rose to this lease was wholly unnecessary; that the death of T. C. Rose on June 12, 1919, did not determine the lease or affect its validity; that it has kept and observed the conditions of that lease and paid the rentals thereon when the same became due. It is clear that T. C. Rose intended that his son should have and enjoy…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pond Creek Coal Co. v. HatfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- Estep v. Kentland Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pacific Employers Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- American Wholesale Corp. v. F. & S. Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- John G. Speirs & Co. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Shelman v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
- Rogers v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.