Henry v. Maxum Indemnity Company
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA BRANDON HENRY, ET AL., * CIVIL ACTION Plaintiffs * NO.: 20-2995 * c/w 20-2997, 20-2998 VERSUS * * SECTION: "D" (1) MAXUM INDEMNITY COMPANY, ET * AL. * JUDGE WENDY B. VITTER Defendants * * MAGISTRATE JUDGE * JANIS VAN MEERVELD ** APPLIES TO ALL CASES ** ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is the Motion to Enforce Settlement and to Dismiss all Claims with Prejudice. (Rec. Doc. 564). Considering the several writings of the parties’ counsel, the Court finds a valid and enforceable settlement agreement. Accordingly and for the following…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ortego v. STATE, DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Singleton v. Bunge Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Walk Haydel & Assocs. v. Coastal PowerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- Sam Parich v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Elder v. Elder & Elder Enterprises, Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.